In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Health Psychology

Document Type : research

Authors

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Imamreza International University, Mashhad, Iran

10.30473/ijohp.2024.66050.1279

Abstract

Objective: Previous research has shown that health engagement accounts for a substantial variance in positive attitudes about the COVID-19 vaccine in public. However, these studies are hardly able to explain intrapersonal characteristics. Thus, we examined the moderating effect of four character strengths (kindness, critical thinking, fairness, and prudence) in the relation between health engagement and positive attitudes to the COVID-19 vaccine.
Method: The population consisted of all university students living in Mashhad. A sample of 600 individuals was recruited through convenience sampling. The participants completed a battery of questionnaires including a health engagement questionnaire, Values in Action-Inventory of Strengths, and attitudes towards vaccination questionnaire during the COVID-19 pandemic. A hierarchical regression model and slope analysis were used to examine the moderation effect. 
Results: The findings indicated a positive and significant correlation between health engagement and a positive attitude towards vaccination (r=.23; p<.01). The character strengths were significantly and positively associated with health engagement (r=.18; p<.01), and a positive attitude toward vaccination (r=.30; p<.01). Moreover, the moderating effect of character strengths on the relationship between health engagement and a positive attitude towards vaccination was significant (t=-4.08; p<.001).
Conclusion: Therefore, the character strengths could moderate the effect of health engagement on a positive attitude towards vaccination. It can be concluded that character strengths have a moderating effect on making health-related decisions in stressful conditions such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords

Article Title [Persian]

رابطه بین مشارکت در سلامت و نگرش مثبت درباره واکسیناسیون کووید 19: نقش تعدیل کننده توانمندی های شخصیت

Author [Persian]

  • عطا طهرانچی

Abstract [Persian]

هدف: پژوهش های پیشین نشان داده اند که مشارکت در سلامت بخش عمده ای از واریانس مربوط به نگرش مثبت نسبت به واکسیناسیون کووید 19 را در جمعیت عمومی تبیین می کند. با این وجود مطالعات قبلی در تبیین ویژگی های بین فردی محدودیت دارند. بدین ترتیب در مطالعه حاضر اثر تعدیل کننده چهار توانمندی شخصیت (مهربانی، انصاف، تفکر نقاد و فروتنی) را در رابطه بین مشارکت در سلامت و نگرش مثبت نسبت به واکسن کووید 19 مورد بررسی قرار داده است.
روش: جامعه آماری شامل تمام دانشجویان ساکن مشهد بود. نمونه ای متشکل از 600 آزمودنی از طریق نمونه گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. شرکت کنندگان به مجموعه ای از پرسشنامه ها شامل پرسشنامه مشارکت در سلامت، سیاهه توانمندیها-ارزشها در عمل و نگرش درباره واکسیناسیون در دوران همه گیری کرونا پاسخ دادند. رگرسیون سلسله مراتبی و تحلیل شیب ساده مورد استفاده قرار گرفتند.
نتایج: یافته ها رابطه مثبت و معناداری بین مشارکت در سلامت و نگرش های مثبت نسبت به واکسیناسیون را نشان دادند (23/0=r. 01/0=p). توانمندیهای شخصیت به شکل مثبت و معناداری با مشارکت در سلامت(18/0=r. 01/0=p) و نگرش مثبت نسبت به واکسیناسیون همبستگی داشتند(30/0=r. 01/0=p). علاوه بر این، اثر تعدیل کننده توانمندیهای شخصیت در رابطه بین مشارکت در سلامت و نگرش مثبت نسبت به واکسیناسیون معنادار بود (08/4-=t، 001/0>p).
نتیجه گیری: بنابراین توانمندی های شخصیت توانستند اثر مشارکت در سلامت بر نگرش مثبت نسبت به واکسیناسیون را تعدیل کنند. می توان نتیجه گیری کرد که توانمندیهای شخصیت اثر تعدیل کننده در تصمیم گیری درباره سلامت دارند.

Keywords [Persian]

  • توانمندی های شخصیت
  • نگرش مثبت نسبت به واکسیناسیون
  • مشارکت در سلامت
  • همه گیری کووید 19
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Sage.
Ansari-Moghaddam, A., Seraji, M., Sharafi, Z. et al. (2021). The protection motivation theory for predict intention of COVID-19 vaccination in Iran: a structural equation modeling approach. BMC Public Health 211165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11134-8
Bellato, A. (2020). Psychological factors underlying adherence to COVID-19 regulations: A commentary on how to promote compliance through mass media and limit the risk of a second wave. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2(1):100062. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100062.
 Bodner, T. E. (2017). Standardized effect sizes for moderated conditional fixed effects with continuous moderator variables. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00562
Carrieri, V., Lagravinese, R., & Resce, G. (2021). Predicting vaccine hesitancy from area-level indicators: A machine learning approach. Health Economics, 30(12), 3248–3256.
Castellini, G., Savarese, M., Leone, S., Previtali, E., Armuzzi, A., & Graffigna, G. (2020). Italian IBD patients coping with Covid-19 emergency: the mitigating role of psychological readiness to engage in self-care. Inflammatory bowel diseases26(10), 130-131.
Changizi, M., Ghahremani, L., Ahmadloo, N., & Kaveh, M. H. (2022). Patient Health Engagement Model as the Predictor of Social Support, Self-efficacy, and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients. Journal of Education and Community Health9(1), 26-31.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology-The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. The American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239.
Graffigna, G., Palamenghi, L., Boccia, S., & Barello, S. (2020). Relationship between Citizens’ Health Engagement and Intention to Take the COVID-19 Vaccine in Italy: A Mediation Analysis. Vaccines. 8(4):576. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040576
Graffigna, G., Barello, S., Bonanomi, A., & Lozza, E. (2015). Measuring patient engagement: development and psychometric properties of the Patient Health Engagement (PHE) Scale. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 274.
Graffigna, G., Barello, S., Savarese, M., Palamenghi, L., Castellini, G., Bonanomi, A., & Lozza, E. (2020). Measuring Italian citizens’ engagement in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic containment measures:A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 15, e0238613.
Green, S. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behav. Res. 26, 499–510.
Green, Z. A. (2021). Character strengths intervention for nurturing well-being among Pakistan's university students: A mixed-method study. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12301
Halvorsen, K., Dihle, A., Hansen, C., Nordhaug, M., Jerpseth, H., Tveiten, S., Joranger, P., & Ruud Knutsen, I. (2020). Empowerment in healthcare: A thematic synthesis and critical discussion of concept analyses of empowerment. Patient Educ. Couns, 103, 1263–1271.
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hellman, C. M., & Gwinn, C. (2017). Camp HOPE as an intervention for children exposed to domestic violence: A program evaluation of hope, and strength of character. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 34(3), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10560-016-0460-6.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037///1089-2680.6.4.307.
Kamkari, K., & Eskandari, M. (2022). Survey of Psychopathological Profile of Cured Patients of COVID-19 Disease. Iranian Journal of Health Psychology5(2), 63-70.
Koch, J. M., Murrell, L., Knutson, D., & Federici, D. (2020). Promoting students’ strengths to cultivate mental well-being: Relationships between college students’ character strengths, well-being, and social group participation. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 47(1), 86-102.
Liu, Q., & Wang, Z. (2021). Perceived stress of the COVID-19 pandemic and adolescents' depression symptoms: The moderating role of character strengths. Personality and individual differences, 182, 111062.
Marco, W., Lisa, W., & Willibald, R. (2016). Positive feelings at school: On the relationships between students’ character strengths, school-related affect, and school functioning. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10902-014-9597-1.
Martínez-Martí, M. L., & Ruch, W. (2017). Character strengths predict resilience over and above positive affect, self-efficacy, optimism, social support, self-esteem, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(2), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1163403
Nania, T., Dellafiore, F., Caruso, R., & Barello, S. (2020). Risk and protective factors for psychological distress among Italian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: The beneficial role of health engagement. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatr. 67(1), 102-103.
Oster, E. (2018). Does disease cause vaccination? Disease outbreaks and vaccination response. Journal of Health Economics, 57, 90–101.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association; Oxford University Press.
Philipson, T. (1996). Private vaccination and public health: An empirical examination for U.S. measles. Journal of Human Resources, 31(3), 611–630.
Sim, M., Kim, S. Y., & Suh, Y. (2022). Sample size requirements for simple and complex mediation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement82(1), 76-106.
Thoits, P. A. (1994). Stressors and problem-solving: The individual as psychological activist. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137362.
Zhang, Y., & Chen, M. (2018). Character strengths, strengths use, future self-continuity and subjective well-being among Chinese university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1040. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01040