Research methodology and measurement in health psychology
Zahra Asgari; Younes Doostian
Abstract
Objective: This overview aims to synthesize evidence from systematic reviews on the characteristics of effective PSR interventions for individuals with SUDs across all recovery stages.
Method: The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251149640). We will conduct systematic searches in PubMed, Web ...
Read More
Objective: This overview aims to synthesize evidence from systematic reviews on the characteristics of effective PSR interventions for individuals with SUDs across all recovery stages.
Method: The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251149640). We will conduct systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EBSCOhost, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for peer-reviewed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and scoping reviews published in English between 2015 and 2025. The search strategy, developed in adherence to PRESS guidelines, will combine keywords and MeSH terms for SUDs and PSR. Study selection will follow PRISMA guidelines, with screening and deduplication performed in Covidence and EndNote. Primary study overlap will be assessed using citation matrices and the corrected covered area (CCA) method. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews will be evaluated using AMSTAR-2. The certainty of the scoping evidence will be assessed using PRISMA-ScR.
Results: The primary outcome will be the identification of key characteristics (e.g., components, delivery formats, and contextual factors) of effective PSR interventions.
Conclusion: This overview will identify and synthesize key effective practices, including specific intervention components (e.g., social skills training, psychological support, contingency management, vocational elements) and delivery formats (e.g., in-person, telehealth, integrated care models). This comprehensive framework will directly inform practitioners designing evidence-based PSR programs and guide policymakers allocating funds toward the most effective models. It will also highlight critical evidence gaps and propose future research directions, ultimately aiming to improve psychosocial outcomes and support long-term recovery for individuals with SUDs.
maryam mazloom; shahram mohammadkhani
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the different motives and substance use risk profile in opium and methamphetamine use. Method: The statistical sample includes Seventy-eight individuals with substance use history referred to drop-in center (DIC) that completed research instruments including demographic ...
Read More
Objective: This study investigates the different motives and substance use risk profile in opium and methamphetamine use. Method: The statistical sample includes Seventy-eight individuals with substance use history referred to drop-in center (DIC) that completed research instruments including demographic information (researcher-made questionnaire), substance use motives (Hecimovic, Barrett, Darredeau, and Stewart, 2014), and substance use risk profile scale (Woicik et al., 2009). Multivariate analysis of variance utilized for data analysis based on SPSS-24. Results: The results of the MANOVA indicated that availability, relaxation, enjoying, and sexual motives are significantly higher in individuals using methamphetamine. Also, the results of the substance use risk profile represent that there are significant differences in anxiety sensitivity, sensation-seeking, and impulsivity in opium and methamphetamine use. Conclusions: Findings indicate the important role of motives and substance use risk profile in the tendency to the different types of substances. These various motives and personality risk factors should be considered in educational settings and psychological treatment for different types of substance use, especially opiate or stimulating substances.
